Yesterday, I was talking about Iraq with someone, and she said, "You know people make a big deal of the violence in Iraq, but they forget that it's only taking place in five of eighteen provinces. And the Kurdish region is doing great."
That's a common argument for those who want to see hope in Iraq, but I don't think it holds up to scrutiny. By that reasoning, the U.S. Civil War wasn't a big deal, because most of the fighting took place in a handful of southern states, and the far western states were hardly affected at all. Yes, Sherman's scorched-earth policy, razed many of the southern cities, but New York, Boston, and Philadelphia were hardly touched by the violence.
Or, to use a more modern analogy, what if someone told you that life in New York, Pennsylvania, Texas, California, and Florida was a living hell, but Michigan was doing great, and the rest of the country was fairly stable? Five out of fifty isn't really so bad, right? Even if the five hell-holes happen to be some of the most populous states, at least New Mexico's okay, and Michigan is thriving.
